Mueller, Georg P. 2014-07-01 Contradictory and missing outcomes are problems common to many qualitative comparative studies, based on the methodology of crisp-set QCA. They also occur in public policy analyses, e.g. if important background variables are omitted or outcomes of new policies are technically censored. As a new solution to these problems, this article proposes the use of three-valued modal logic, originally introduced by the Polish philosopher Jan Lukasiewicz (1970). In addition to true and false, indeterminate is the third truth-value in this alternative approach, which serves to code missing or contradictory data. Moreover, modal operators allow a differentiation between strict and possible triggers and inhibitors of policy outcomes. The advantages of three-valued modal logic in crisp-set QCA are illustrated by an empirical example from comparative welfare policy analysis. Its conclusions allow comparisons with the corresponding results from a conventional crisp-set QCA of the same data-set. application/pdf https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/303604 https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/303604/files/WP_SES_450.pdf eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess License undefined Three-valued modal logic qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) public policy social security international comparisons info:eu-repo/classification/udc/32 Three-Valued Modal Logic for Qualitative Comparative Policy Analysis with Crisp-Set QCA http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18ws