<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Chouiter, Leila</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Dieguez, Sebastian</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Annoni, Jean-Marie</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Spierer, Lucas</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2014-03-01</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">Task-irrelevant information is constantly present in our environment and may interfere  with the processing of the information necessary to achieve goal-directed behavior.  While task goals determine which information must be suppressed, the demand for  inhibitory control depends on the strength of the interference induced by incoming,  task-irrelevant information. Whether the same or distinct inhibitory processes are  engaged to suppress various degrees of interference from task-irrelevant information  remains largely unresolved. We investigated this question by manipulating the  strength of the conflict induced by automatic word reading in a classical color Stroop  task. High conflict was induced by presenting words in participant’s native language  and low conflict by presenting words in a less familiar language. Behavioral  performance and electrical neuroimaging analyses of event-related potentials to the  words were analyzed following a two-by-two within-subject design with factors conflict  strength (high; low) and color word/word ink congruency (congruent; incongruent).  Behaviorally, we observed a significant conflict strength × congruency driven by a  smaller Stroop effect in the low- than high conflict condition. Electrophysiologically, we  observed a significant conflict strength × congruency interaction at the topographic  level during the period of the N450 components, indicative of the engagement of  distinct configurations of brain networks. No such interaction was found at the level of  response strength. Electrical sources analyses localized the topographic effect within  the anterior cingulate cortex and basal ganglia, left middle frontal and occipital areas.  We interpret our results in terms of qualitatively distinct executive mechanisms for  reactive inhibitory control in conditions of high versus low stimulus-driven conflict.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/303395</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/303395/files/10548_2013_Article_303.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/303395/files/ann_hls_sm.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s10548-013-0303-0</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Brain Topography. - 2014, vol. 27, no. 2, p. 279–292</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/57</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">High and low stimulus-driven conflict engage segregated brain networks, not quantitatively different resources</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
