<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Besson, Samantha</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2011</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">Human rights and democracy have been regarded as a mutually reinforcing couple by  many political theorists to date. The internationalisation of human rights post-1945 is  often said to have severed those links, however. Accounting for the legitimacy of  international human rights requires exploring how human rights and democracy, once  they have been decoupled or disconnected, can be recoupled or reunited across  governance levels (vertically) and maybe even at the same governance level  (horizontally) albeit beyond the state. The article does so in three steps. The first  prong of the argument is dedicated to presenting the moral-political nature of human  rights and their relationship to political equality and, hence, their inherent legal nature  from a democratic theory perspective. The second section of the article then draws  some implications for the domestic or international levels of legal recognition and  specification of human rights by reference to their legitimation within the domestic  democratic community. It explains the mutual relationship between human rights and  citizens’ rights and where international human rights draw their democratic legitimacy  from. In the third and final section, the author discusses potential changes in the  nature and legitimacy of international human rights once political structures beyond  the state become more democratic, and human rights and democracy are being  recoupled again at various levels of governance. The European Union being one of  the most advanced examples of post-national political integration, recent  developments in the regime of human rights protection within the EU are discussed in  this new light. In a final step, the transposition to the global level of the argument  developed in the European case is assessed and the author flags issues for further  research on what democratic theorists should hope for in the new global order.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/301948</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/301948/files/Human_Rights_Besson.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3402/egp.v4i1.6348</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Ethics and Global Politics. - 2011, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 19-50</dc:source>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Democracy</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns2="xml" ns2:lang="en">Human rights</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns3="xml" ns3:lang="en">Legitimacy</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns4="xml" ns4:lang="en">Citizens’ rights</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns5="xml" ns5:lang="en">Maus</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns6="xml" ns6:lang="en">Right tohave rights</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns7="xml" ns7:lang="en">Arendt</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns8="xml" ns8:lang="en">Legal rights</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns9="xml" ns9:lang="en">International law</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns10="xml" ns10:lang="en">EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns11="xml" ns11:lang="en">Global institutions</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns12="xml" ns12:lang="en">Habermas</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns13="xml" ns13:lang="en">Lafont</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/34</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns14="xml" ns14:lang="en">Human Rights and Democracy in a Global Context - Decoupling and Recoupling</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
