<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Leukel, Christian</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Taube, Wolfgang</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Lorch, Michael</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Gollhofer, Albert</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2011-07-14</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">Drop-jumps are controlled by predictive and reactive motor strategies which differ with  respect to the utilization of sensory feedback. With reaction, sensory feedback is  integrated while performing the task. With prediction, sensory information may be  used prior to movement onset. Certainty about upcoming events is important for  prediction. The present study aimed at investigating how uncertainties in the task  execution affect predictive motor control in drop-jumps. Ten healthy subjects (22 ± 1  years, &lt;i&gt;M&lt;/i&gt; ± &lt;i&gt;SD&lt;/i&gt;) participated. The subjects performed either (i) drop- jumps by knowing that they might had to switch to a landing movement upon an  auditory cue, which was sometimes elicited prior to touch-down (uncertainty). In (ii),  subjects performed drop-jumps by knowing that there would be no auditory cue and  consequently no switch of the movement (certainty). The m. soleus EMG prior to  touch-down was higher when subjects knew there would be no auditory cue  compared to when subjects performed the same task but switching from drop-jump to  landing was possible (uncertainty). The EMG was reversed in the late concentric  phase, meaning that it was higher in the high uncertainty task. The results of the  present study showed that the muscular activity was predictively adjusted according to  uncertainties in task execution. It is argued that tendomuscular stiffness was the  variable responsible for the adjustment of muscular activity. The required  tendomuscular stiffness was higher in drop-jumps than in landings. Consequently,  when it was not certain whether to jump or to land, muscular activity and therefore  tendomuscular stiffness was reduced.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/301934</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/301934/files/tau_cpm.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.humov.2011.04.006</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Human Movement Science. - 2012, vol. 31, no. 1, p. 152-160</dc:source>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Drop-jump</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns2="xml" ns2:lang="en">Landing</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns3="xml" ns3:lang="en">Muscular stiffness</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns4="xml" ns4:lang="en">Feedforward control</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns5="xml" ns5:lang="en">Feedback control</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/796</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns6="xml" ns6:lang="en">Changes in predictive motor control in drop-jumps based on uncertainties in task execution</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
