<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Kelly, David J.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Liu, Shaoying</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Rodger, Helen</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Miellet, Sebastien</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Ge, Liezhong</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Caldara, Roberto</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2011</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">Perception and eye movements are affected by culture. Adults from Eastern societies  (e.g. China) display a disposition to process information holistically, whereas  individuals from Western societies (e.g. Britain) process information analytically.  Recently, this pattern of cultural differences has been extended to face processing.  Adults from Eastern cultures fixate centrally towards the nose when learning and  recognizing faces, whereas adults from Western societies spread fixations across the  eye and mouth regions. Although light has been shed on how adults can fixate  different areas yet achieve comparable recognition accuracy, the reason why such  divergent strategies exist is less certain. Although some argue that culture shapes  strategies across development, little direct evidence exists to support this claim.  Additionally, it has long been claimed that face recognition in early childhood is  largely reliant upon external rather than internal face features, yet recent studies have  challenged this theory. To address these issues, we tested children aged 7–12 years  of age from the UK and China with an old ⁄ new face recognition paradigm while  simultaneously recording their eye movements. Both populations displayed patterns  of fixations that were consistent with adults from their respective cultural groups,  which ‘strengthened’ across development as qualified by a pattern classifier analysis.  Altogether, these observations suggest that cultural forces may indeed be  responsible for shaping eye movements from early childhood. Furthermore, fixations  made by both cultural groups almost exclusively landed on internal face regions,  suggesting that these features, and not external features, are universally used to  achieve face recognition in childhood.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/301921</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/301921/files/j.1467-7687.2011.01067.x.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01067.x</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Developmental Science. - 2011, vol. 14, no. 5, p. 1176-1184</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/159.9</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Developing Cultural Differences in Face Processing</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
