<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Townsend, Jeffrey P.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Leuenberger, Christoph</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2011-02-08</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">Optimal rates of evolution and the informativeness of characters for phylogenetic  inference have received increasing attention as the effort to distinguish phylogenetic  signal and noise from large data sets intensifies. Ascertaining optimal rates for  character evolution and predicting sequences featuring high phylogenetic utility are  challenging tasks for which little theory has been developed. We argue for the usage  of predictive theoretical tools that identify phylogenetic signal for quartets of taxa. We  demonstrate analytically that, under an infinite states model, phylogenetically optimal  rates of character evolution increase with greater taxon sampling. Finally, we argue for  the development of increasingly sophisticated tools for the prediction of phylogenetic  informativeness that incorporate higher taxon sampling and that directly account for  phylogenetic noise. In a recent paper, Klopfstein et al. (2010) evaluate and critique  profiles of phylogenetic informativeness ( Townsend 2007), a method designed to  inform the choice of markers for phylogenetic inference, and to interpret of the power  of data sets to resolve short deep internodes in the history of life. To motivate their  critique, Klopfstein et al. (2010) provide two analyses. First, they profile the  phylogenetic informativeness of CO1 and 28S rRNA and reconstruct phylogeny for  diplazontine parasitoid wasps. Second, they perform simulations to test the optimal  rate of character change against a prediction based on four-taxon theory in Townsend  (2007), addressing data sets of increasing numbers of taxa. With regard to their  empirical data set, Klopfstein et al. (2010) find fault with the relation between the  quartet-based ( Townsend 2007) phylogenetic informativeness profile and the results  of phylogenetic inference. Furthermore, they argue that their simulations indicate a  dramatic trend in the optimal rate of change of a character for phylogenetic inference,  such that the greater the taxon sampling, the slower the optimal rate of change of the  characters. Here, we dispute these claims. …</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/301692</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/301692/files/syq097.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/sysbio/syq097</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Systematic Biology. - 2011, vol. 60, no. 3, p. 358-365</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/57</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Taxon Sampling and the optimal rates of evolution for phylogenetic inference</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
