<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Suter, Stefan M.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Bielańska, Joanna</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Röthlin-Spillmann, Sabine</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Strambini, Ludivine</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Meyer, Dietrich R.</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2009-04-03</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">Females of many socially monogamous bird species accept or even actively seek  copulations outside the social pair bond. It has been shown that females profit from  extrapair fertilization by increased offspring quality, but extrapair mating may also  induce costs to females. We measured parental food provisioning and paternity in the  reed bunting, Emberiza schoeniclus, a species with biparental brood care and high  levels of extrapair paternity (EPP). We found a negative relationship between the  proportion of EPP in broods and paternal care across the local population. Individual  males adjusted food provisioning to the amount of EPP between sequential broods.  Females did compensate for low male food provisioning. The cost of extrapair  fertilizations to females is increased nestling mortality due to the social partner's  reduction of brood care. If the mixed mating system of the reed bunting is at an  evolutionary equilibrium, we expect that genetic fitness for males as well as for  females is maximized. Any costs incurred by extrapair mating should therefore not  exceed the benefits for both sexes.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/301146</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/301146/files/Behavioral_Ecology_2009.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/beheco/arp037</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Behavioral Ecology. - 2009, vol. 20, no. 3, p. 601-608</dc:source>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">extrapair paternity</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns2="xml" ns2:lang="en">infidelity</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns3="xml" ns3:lang="en">parental care</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns4="xml" ns4:lang="en">paternal care</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns5="xml" ns5:lang="en">reed bunting</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/59</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns6="xml" ns6:lang="en">The cost of infidelity to female reed buntings</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
