<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Müller-Schärer, Heinz</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Schaffner, Urs</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2008-03-15</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">Practitioners of classical biological control of invasive weeds are confronted with a  dual expectation: to achieve successful control of plant invaders and to avoid damage  to nontarget plants and adverse indirect effects. In this paper we discuss key issues  that we consider to be crucial for a safe, efficient, and successful classical biological  control project, and that have also caused some recent controversy. These include  selection of effective control agents, host specificity of the biological control agents,  implications of the genetic population structure of the target populations, and potential  impact on native food webs. With regard to improving the success rate of biological  control of plant invaders, we first emphasize the importance of a clear a priori  definition of success and a more ecosystem-based approach to better document both  negative effects of the invasive plant as well as potential positive and negative effects  of introducing biological control agents. Secondly, pre-release impact assessment  could be improved by better focusing on how to reach high densities of the control  agents and by including tolerance to and compensation of herbivory. Thirdly, we  advocate a reinforced effort to integrate and combine biological control in combination  with existing or potential management options. Finally, we propose various ecological  and evolutionary hypotheses in the framework of our topic to document that biological  control programmes against plant invaders also offer a great opportunity to gain new  insights into basic processes in ecology and evolution.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/300820</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/300820/files/10530_2008_Article_9238.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s10530-008-9238-x</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Biological Invasions. - 2008, vol. 10, no. 6, p. 859-874</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/57</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Classical biological control : exploiting enemy escape to manage plant invasions</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
