<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Mosar, Jon</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Lewis, Gavin</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Torsvik, Trond H.</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2002</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">Tertiary development of the Norwegian continental margin was dominated by the  opening of the Arctic–North Atlantic Ocean. The correct identification of magnetic  anomalies and their ages and the analysis of spreading rates during the formation of  this ocean are important in understanding the development of the region and  specifically the history of its passive margins. Three ocean domains, the Ægir,  Reykjanes and Mohns regions, were investigated in an effort to understand the lateral  changes in structural development of the passive margin after continental break-up.  Spreading rates generally slowed down from 2 cm a⁻¹ after Early Eocene initiation of  sea-floor spreading, to values around 0.5 cm a⁻¹ in Oligocene time. An increase in  spreading rates to around 1 cm a⁻¹ coincided with the positioning of the Iceland  hotspot under the North Atlantic mid-ocean ridge. At the same time, the European  plate changed its absolute plate motion from a north-directed drift to a motion more  towards the east. The location of inversion structures in the Vøring and Faeroes Basin  rather than in the Møre Basin is related to differences in spreading rates. The Mohns  and the Reykjanes Ridges produced more ocean floor than the Ægir–Kolbeinsey  Ridges. Asymmetric ocean-floor formation in the Ægir Ridge led to differential stress  at the base of the lithosphere, which probably explains the absence of inversion  features in the Møre Basin (less mantle drag). Furthermore, upper plate margins such  as the Vøring Basin and possibly the Faeroe Basin have a lower compressional  strength than lower plate margins such as the Møre Basin, and therefore preferentially  developed inversion structures. Along the transform boundaries separating the  domains, additional stress probably built up along extension of the transform zones  into the extended continental crust. This additional stress probably also assisted  initiation of the inversion structures in the Vøring Basin and the Faeroes area. The  amplification of the inversion structures in the Vøring Basin and the Faeroes Basin  was subsequently caused by a variety of processes related to sedimentation and  uplift–erosion.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/299580</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/299580/files/1_mosar_nas.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1144/0016-764901-135</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Journal of the Geological Society. - 2002, vol. 159, no. 5, p. 503-515</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/55</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">North Atlantic sea-floor spreading rates: implications for the Tertiary development of inversion structures of the Norwegian–Greenland Sea</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
